I’ve come across this video a few times in my news-feed this week and finally got the chance to watch it. I posted a blog – years ago- about the beauty premium and I thought about that as I finished up the video clip.
I’ve listened to the end about 5 times and the line “…that was never a comedy for me” just really sticks with me.
Ladies — do you feel it? A pressure to be “attractive” or more attractive than you are or at least as attractive as you can be?
Do you feel like you are treated differently depending on how “attractive you are?”
Yesterday, I would have said, “I’m a lady who doesn’t care about looks and I’d be silly to care. What you see is what you get. I want to be judged on my mind and personality, not on what I look like.” I rarely wear makeup, except mascara and lip gloss/chapstick. I often wear my hair in a ponytail or bun to work. I wear t shirts and flip flops to the office (yup still can’t shake those flip flops). My sense of fashion has been questioned on more than one occasion (I call it “power clashing” or “the messy professor”). I get dolled up for special occasions. People do a double take when they see photos of my from when I’m outside of work and I have my hair done and makeup on and they ask, “is that you?!?!”
But today, after watching the video and giving it some thought — Am I a Tootsie? Do I wear the badge of ugly duckling proudly because I’ve given in and been brainwashed too. “Hey I don’t measure up to society’s thoughts of attractiveness, but look at my big brain and incredibly quick wit?” Or am I just proudly waving my freak flag and keeping it weird? Its Saturday morning and I’m confused. 🙂
Confusion is a good thing because that leads to discussion! I want to delve a bit deeper into the role of attractiveness and how we perceive ourselves and others? Is there really a difference? And let’s reprise the topic of the “beauty premium.”
Under mounting pressure from activists and advertisers, Facebook is ramping up efforts to stamp out hate speech, particularly depictions of violence against women.
The move, announced Tuesday, came after a weeklong campaign by women’s groups targeting pages that celebrated or made light of rape, domestic violence and sexual degradation of women.
“In recent days, it has become clear that our systems to identify and remove hate speech have failed to work as effectively as we would like, particularly around issues of gender-based hate,” Marne Levine, a Facebook vice president in charge of public policy, wrote in a post on the site.
“In some cases, content is not being removed as quickly as we want. In other cases, content that should be removed has not been or has been evaluated using outdated criteria. We have been working over the past several months to improve our systems to respond to reports of violations, but the guidelines used by these systems have failed to capture all the content that violates our standards. We need to do better — and we will.”
via Under pressure, Facebook targets sexist hate speech – CNN.com.
Plus-size fashion model Jennie Runk isn’t just sitting pretty—she’s using her fame to promote positive body image in an essay she penned Wednesday for the BBC News. In the editorial, she urges women to stop worrying about their thighs and feel comfortable in their skin no matter what type of body they have, touching on her own awkward teenage years.
More on Yahoo! Shine: Abercrombie & Fitch Attack Video Aims to Dress Homeless Everywhere In “Cool Kid” Brand
Runk rose to prominence in early May when she was selected by clothing retailer H&M to model their new swimsuit line on the company homepage. For the campaign, the 24-year-old 5’10 beauty, who wears a dress size 14-16, traipsed on a beach wearing bikinis and one-piece swimsuits. The seemingly innocent photo series sent shockwaves around the Internet. First, H&M has a history of featuring toned models (Gisele is the company’s latest cover girl, replacing a bikini-clad Beyonce) so selecting Runk, of normal, healthy proportions, to model their new line was a refreshing departure. And second, unlike many companies who bury plus-size selections deep within their websites, H&M never once mentioned the word “plus-size” on the same page as the images of Runk (you have to click on the clothing samples to land in the plus-size section). The company message was clear: “Our model isn’t stick thin—so what?”
via H&M Plus Size Model Jennie Runk Puts Unexpected Fame to Good Use | Fashion – Yahoo! Shine.
If moms earned wages for the work they do around the house and with the kids, they’d be getting a pay cut this year.
The take-home pay that a mother would earn for everything from cooking to handling the family finances would total at $59,862 if she were paid on the open market, according to Insure.com’s analysis of government data on hourly wages.
That’s down from $60,182 in 2012 and $61,436 in 2011, Insure.com’s annual Mother’s Day Index shows.
The drop is because typical wages for some domestic jobs have fallen, said Amy Danise, a spokeswoman for Insure.com.
via Mom’s work is never done – and now it’s worth less, too – Life Inc..
Open Thread: Does Hiring and Promoting Women Make Your Company Diverse?
Check out the story here at Fast Company and give your thoughts!